Les scénarios élargis de traitement de l'hépatite C ont un effet substantiel sur la santé, mais la capacité pose problème

Les récentes percées dans le traitement de l'hépatite pourraient réduire considérablement la prévalence du virus, mais elles sont coûteuses. Pour en savoir plus, en anglais, veuillez lire les informations ci-dessous.

Abonnez-vous à l'Alerte mensuelle de l'IDPC pour recevoir des informations relatives à la politique des drogues.

by Karen Van Nuys, Ronald Brookmeyer, Jacquelyn W. Chou, David Dreyfus, Douglas Dieterich and Dana P. Goldman

Treatment of hepatitis C virus, the most common chronic viral infection in the United States, has historically suffered from challenges including serious side effects, low efficacy, and ongoing transmission and reinfection. Recent innovations have produced breakthrough therapies that are effective in more than 90 percent of patients. These treatments could dramatically reduce the virus’s prevalence but are costly.

To quantify the benefit of these treatments to society, including the value of reduced transmission, the authors estimated the effects of several hepatitis C treatment strategies on cost and population health. Treating patients at all disease stages could generate $610–$1,221 billion in additional quality-adjusted life-years, plus an additional $139 billion in saved medical expenditures over fifty years, and minimize the disease burden, but up-front treatment costs would exceed $150 billion. An intermediate scenario—treating 5 percent of the infected population annually, regardless of patients’ disease stages—would also return substantial benefits and would be much more affordable under current financing schemes.

Click here to read the full article (restricted access).

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

Thumbnail: Flickr CC NVinacco